« January 2014 | Main | March 2014 »
BassFan has updated their World Rankings now that the Bassmaster Classic is over. Of our currently tracked Indiana pros, 4 moved up in the rankings, while 4 moved down. You can see their respective new ranks over on the right hand sidebar of the page. The Classic, as well as the first FLW Tour event a couple weeks prior down on Okeechobee are the newest events to be added into the calculations, the first update since late October of 2013. The FLW Tour will be back in action in less than 2 week when they head over to Lake Hartwell. That will be followed the next week by the openener for the Bassmaster Elite Tour on Lake Seminole, so expect a lot more changes to this list over the coming weeks.
Permalink | Comments (0)
Reblog (0) | |
Reports are Patoka has a few open holes but was largely frozen over completely this weekned. Likewise, Monroe had up to 6" of ice before the rain, and lakes in central Indiana such as Geist had over 12" prior. There are several early tourneys scheduled for Patoka in early March including the Cabin Fever event on the 8th and the H.O.T. on the 16th. Beyond that, many events begin the following weekend all over the state. Given this extended forecast showing sub-freezing highs through at least the first week of March, don't be surprised if many early bass tourney events get canceled or postponed. Be sure and keep in touch with tourney organizers as these events get closer.
Permalink | Comments (0)
Reblog (0) | |
While words like 'Polar Vortex' and 'Record Snowfall' have dominated the conversation of most anglers this winter, the fact is Spring is now just around the corner. While it will likely be several more weeks before most of our lakes clear themselves of the thick layer of ice now covering them, it's not too early to take a look at some of the baits we should be throwing when waters do become open. Here are 5 baits that FLW Tour/Red Gold Pro Todd Hollowell recommends for anglers chasing bass this spring on Indiana waters.
1.) Jerkbaits: When the ice first comes off the lakes, our waters will likely be at their coldest and clearest condition of the year. That will make for perfect conditions for throwing these suspending shad imitators. "The clearer the better with a jerkbait" says Todd. In March, you'll want to slow down, and use a suspending model that imitates the dead and dying shad bass will likely be feeding on in our reservoirs. These baits are Todd's first choice for early bass in Indiana. As for which colors to throw, Todd states, "One of the things I try to do, fishing all across the country, is I try and keep things simple. I usually carry two or three patterns on my jerkbaits. I really only have like 4 or 5 specific colors in my entire tacklebox. Bright white, or some chartreuse based color for early morning, low light or slightly stained waters, and Ghost Minnow or Ghost Natural Shad, one of the more translucent type baits, which are great in clearer waters. Beyond that, I keep a few perch colored jerkbaits for northern waters that have a strong yellow perch forage base, especially when around smallmouth." Todd recommends that you check to make sure your baits actually suspend when stopped in the water, as well as to use fluorocarbon line, typically 10-12# test.
2.) Crankbaits: As our waters start to warm into the mid to upper 50s, the fish get more active. Todd finds shallow and mid range crankbaits for covering the 0-10' range in the water column to be ideal, stating that they Allow him to cover a lot of water. "It's at that point I'm going to start focusing on coves and points, both secondary and main lake points when targeting bass," says Todd. Again, he recommends a simple selection of two or three color types including shad (whites, silvers) and crawdad (brown, orange, red) patterns, and also bluegill (greens, orange). "Those are the three basic color patterns that I carry, and I'll have all three tied on and ready on my boat deck in the spring."
3.) Vibrating Jigs: Spring in Indiana also means frequent rain showers. When this occurs, Todd likes to pull out and throw vibrating jigs. Todd say these are, "One of my favorite baits for fishing after heavy rains, where you might have runoff, murky or muddy water." The FLW Cup qualifier will typically use black/blue or green pumpkin, or some combination of the two in the darker waters. He also suggests varying your retrieve, and not just using a steady straight wind of the reel with these baits.
4.) Swim Jigs: Later in the spring (post-spawn), Todd recommends throwing some baits that the fish likely haven't been as pressured with. One such favorite bait of his is a swim jig. "This is basically a spinnerbait without a blade, but it's a lot more subtle," he says. Hollowell recommends staying with either 1/4- or 3/8-oz. weights which allow for slower, medium-speed retrieves in shallow waters near where the bass will be spawning. Todd adds, " This is a great bait for when your spinnerbait bite goes away."
5.) Tubes: At some point, spring bass start feeding a lot on crawdads. When this occurs, Todd recommends a tube as "a great crawdad imitator." Additionally, he says it's great for pressured water. Another specific instance where Todd really likes this bait is during 'down time.' Todd states, "Along with a Senko, a tube is great for just casting out and letting it (your bait) sit there while you attend to things in your boat. Whether you are taking a minute to eat a sandwich, check on your fish in the livewell, or using your cell phone, if you don't have a bait in the water, you won't catch a fish." While not a big fish bait, Todd says it is a great bait for "keepers", plus you can rig it weedless for skipping around shallow cover.
Permalink | Comments (0)
Reblog (0) | |
Indiana Bass Tournament Anglers Added to the Endangered Species List
I did my usual yesterday and took a half day off work to hang out at the Boat, Sport and Travel Show in Indy for the afternoon. It's usually a good day to make the jaunt. While I typically miss a lot of the big name speakers that attend on weekends, I also miss a majority of the people traffic. Given the icing threat, yesterday was particularly slow it seemed, and I got plenty of time to browse, talk and listen. When it was all said and done about 4 hours later, I came to the conclusion that bass tournaments in this state, and arguably the anglers that fish them, are dead.
I know many of you probably don't feel like you're dead, but you're still in a zombie state where the realization hasn't hit you yet. All you had to do was take a good look around you at that show and you'd see what I'm talking about. The most obvious sign that this is the case was the boat hall exhibits. I counted 2 Rangers and 4 Nitros - and that was it! No Tritons. No Legends. No Skeeters. No Stratos. No Champions. No Phoenix. No Javelins. No BassCat. No Kentucky fast boats. Gone. I saw a lot of Mercury engines on the boats, but what happened to all the Yamaha's, E-Tec's and Suzuki's? Maybe they were there and I just missed them...not good either way.
I got the chance to chat with several of the boat salesmen and they pretty much confirmed what I was seeing. That new bass boat market around here is dead for a variety of reasons, and it doesn't bode well for the tournament circuits either. The two go hand in hand. Statistics showed that the bass boat industry took some hard hits during the recession that began in 2008. Year over year sales have been down from 10% to 30% each year from 2008-2011. There was the Ranger/Genmar bankruptcy among others. Lots of consolidation, with one trade journal estimating a 25-50 percent loss of boat dealerships during the downturn. And yes, I know it is incredibly expensive to get floor space at that show; but I also know that it typically accounted for between 1/3 to 1/2 of a dealers annual sales in many cases, so it was always a proposition of you couldn't afford to not be there. Maybe you pull a hundred or two people at an Open house, but that pales in comparison to the tens of thousands you pull at the Boat Show. And it's not so much even a floor space issue, as the usual dealers who were still there had much of the same space - they just filled it with smaller fishing boats, pontoons and runabouts, and left the bass boats behind. You got to try and sell what the market will allow, and right now, thast isn't a high end bass boat.
More observations from the show that the end is near. The Federation booth is down to a small corner, and the tables full of tournament entry forms are slim. There is also no more kids casting areas with clubs working the show that I saw, even on "Scout Day." The average age of the anglers running around Tackle Town and the Boat Hall floor wearing their sublimated tournament jerseys was about 58 years old. Again, that lines up nicely with recent boating statistics that show from between 1998 and 2011, the average age of the new outboard powered boat buyer went from 46 to 53 years old over that time span. Looking further into just the bass boat sub-market, the averge buyer of such a new rig is 48.4 years of age. Skeeter has the youngest average buyers at 46.7 years of age, while Ranger and Stratos had the highest at 48.8 and 49.1 respectively. Those numbers tell you that the younger anglers who are supposed to be the next generation of pros aren't in a position to buy, or aren't willing to part with their money for the cost of a new rig these days, which is now likely averaging around $50,000 plus, I'd guess.
You can also see the demise in the tournament circuit stats themselves. While there are about three-quarters of a million registered anglers in the state of Indiana, a big percentage of which like to fish for bass, the number of Indiana anglers who fished on the various tournament circuits last year was dismal. The Hoosier division of the BFL averaged 74 Indiana boaters per event. H.O.T. averaged 73, while the IBF averaged 60. A look at the smaller circuits shows an even worse set of numbers. Fishers of Men North averaged 12 boaters, while the South averaged 30. Meanwhile, the average division of USA Bassin' had 14 guys/teams entered in 2013, while Anglers-Dream had about 11. None of this takes into account the high likelihood of duplication of participants, where the same 75-150 guys are fishing in multiple circuits and getting counted more than once in the numbers.
Of course, declining tourney numbers leads to declining sponsorships, which leads to increased entry fees and/or decreased payouts, or even a complete folding of a circuit (e.g., Got2LoveIt). At the club level, The Federation breakup with BASS put a big hurt on things, and it takes lots of these club level guys paying memberships to belong to the national groups to feed money up the system into the pockets of the real pros (run the numbers).
Perhaps I'm looking at this with an overly critical eye, but I sure didn't walk out of that show yesterday with any warm and fuzzy feelings. So while the sport might be growing or at least rebounding in many other parts of the country, and while it appears that high school and college kids are jumping into competitive bass fishing like never before, everything I see locally tells a story of decline. The "old guns" of the Hoosier bassin' world likely won't be competing in another 10 years or so as most move into their 60s and 70s. So where does the Indiana bass tournament world go from here?
R.I.P.
Permalink | Comments (11)
Reblog (0) | |
It's been an ongoing debate over the years, just what makes a tournament angler consistently good. Back 20 or 30 years ago, the general consensus among at least some pros was that age and experience were key. So while an up and coming "young gun" might do well from time to time, it was the veteran of the professional ranks that would have the overall edge in competition, largely because that long term angler had the benefit of experience on his side that a younger competitor simply hadn't garnered yet. The established pros had been to more waters, in more events, making those key on-the-water decisions year after year, an area where those guys starting out would not have had the chance to accumulate that type of experience yet. In addition, many of the early pros were established guides, with literally thousands of daily fishing trips already under their belts. However, a more recent look at the tournament scene, and it's hard not to realize the potential that many of the mid- and younger generation of anglers has displayed.
Can we somehow quantify this to try and tease out an answer? A look at the data becomes revealing.
I've compiled a look at some of the most well known pros on Tour, trying to see a trend in performance over the course of their careers. The main focus was on what I would term first generation pros, the stalwarts of the game like Nixon, Clunn, Klein and Brauer, and the next generation pros, those now middle aged competitors such as Ike, KVD, Swindle, Reese and Martens. Each graph will have the average place of finish for a given years worth of BASS competition mapped over time, along with a linear trend line. Additonally, the age of the pro has been taken into consideration. So on the Y axis, "Average place of finish," and on the X axis, year with age of competitor in parens. This, for example, makes it easy to compare the average of a 40 year old Nixon with a 40 year old KVD, as opposed to picking a single year when there might be a 15 year or greater age difference to account for.
Let's start with the legends of the sport.
The first thing that should jump out at you is the trend line for the greats, which is certainly a decline in relative performance on the trail as time goes on. This is especially true with Nixon and Clunn, while not as strongly apparent with Brauer and Klein. The difference between the former pair and the latter pair being the overall level of placement, Clunn and Nixon being flat out dominant in their early careers with average finishes in the twenties and thirties, while Klein and Brauer have always been more middle of the road performers, averaging yearly finishes in the low to upper fourties.
One could argue that age and experience doesn't seem to weigh heavily on the outcome, and so perhaps that quality is a bit overblown when it comes to what makes a pro competitive. Of course, with all this analysis, there are numerous factors that could all play a part, so don't get hooked on any one aspect. The basic point I wanted to make with these established veterans is that from looking at the graphs, nowhere do you see a trend suggesting that as the angler accumulated more tournament experience, that there was a corresponding improvement in their performance. In fact, it appears to be the opposite.
So now, let's look at the next generation of pros to dominate the tourney scene.
Again, looking at the trend lines for an initial analysis, you see the exact opposite of the veterans. Here, this next generation of pros is consistently getting better and better as they move along in their careers. In many cases, it actually looks like you can see the inconsistency in performances through their first 5-10 years on tour, whereby after that point, they got things "dialed in" and in nearly all cases, have been performing not only better, but also more consistently year after year. And so you might first argue that experience did help these guys to some degree, at least through the early phases of their careers - point at least partially valid. However, when you query the veterans about this now days, they have a slightly different perspective on what accounts for this compared to their thoughts in the past.
Back in 1996, an article by Steve Waters in the Sun Sentinel captured some of these comments by the first generation pros on the trend of younger anglers doing well in competition.
"The one thing young fishermen have going for them is the belief in the impossible dream. They don't have as much experience, but they make up for it with enthusiasm."- Rick Clunn
"The quality of the anglers gets better every year. I used to feel there were 25 guys I had to beat in a tournament. Now that number has tripled and they all have the mental toughness."- Denny Brauer
"A lot of these young pros don't have a family at home, and they're spending more time on the road at a lot of the lakes that we fish tournaments on and they are really, really good. Part of the reason they're so good is they can look back on 20 years of us teaching them everything in the book about bass. When I started, nobody told us anything, there were no fishing shows on TV, nobody was drawing us diagrams telling us how to fish." - Larry Nixon
You can see where this is starting to go, especially with Larry's comment. In a more recent piece from Bass Resource.com, Gary Klein also pointed toward the incredible increase in information technology as a reason for today's pros being so competitive so early, and how he wasn't surprised by this. As he pointed out in the article, there was no Internet as we know it, no Bass Times, no Bass University back in 1979. The learning curve was a long, slow process, largely due to the lack of widely available information from competition, a total opposite of today's situation where some major organizations are even promoting the use of "Tweets" and pics during competition.
So many of these same early professionals seem to lay at least part of the reason on the early information they generated (techniques, patterns, etc.), combined with the increase in media technology and output that we are so flooded with these days.
Another opinion I've seen expressed very recently was that age itself, and it's toll on the mind and body over time, is a likely contributor. Ned Kehde, In-Fisherman contributor, has posted a couple great pieces recently on the affects of age and how it relates to performance. Unlike the thought of 'age = experience' as a benefit, the down side is 'age = diminished performance' due to physical toll. From one of those recent pieces;
The Lindners observed that as one’s body, mind, and soul ages, the ability to find that zone of rapt attention diminishes. To substantiate that contention, they pointed out that Clunn, Klein and Guido Hibdon’s abilities to win bass tournaments have diminished radically as age has worked it deeds upon them. Ron Lindner, who is 79 years old, said that he is prime example of how an aging mind, body and soul adversely affects his ability to step into that optimal mindset of being in a perfect piscatorial zone, where he can quickly locate and catch largemouth and smallmouth bass.
With fishing, while physical health does play a role, it is much, much slower, kind of like golf. Nevertheless, there is a diminishing of prowess with age. We have plenty of examples in the fishing world. For example, my good friend Roland Martin is having a horrible time on the trail. Can make a top 10 for one day and then fall out of it. The ability to stay in the zone for all three days is what we believe a young man’s game.”
A couple others factors that are likely contributing to this increasing competition from younger and younger anglers; beginning earlier in life, by seeing professional bass angling as a valid career while even as a kid or young adult, and;
The incredible increase in technology from the standpoint of finding fish and understanding and breaking down a lake. Where once all the "original" great bass pros had at their disposal was a flasher and a paper graph, now days anglers have down-imaging, side-imaging, 360-degree viewing, underwater cameras, Hydrowave units, Power Poles, Hi-def mapping chips, etc. While this same technology is available to all pros, there is likely little doubt that the youngest new stars on tour grew up in the age of computers, and are likely the most aggressive adapters and adopters of such technology.
If all this is actually true, then we should see an even greater overall performance over the next several years by what I'd term the third generation of pros, guys like Brandon Palaniuk, Jacob Wheeler, Cody Meyer, Stetson Blaylock and Bradley Roy, for example. For now, they don't have enough years of competition under their belts to generate any meaningful trend data. However, a look at recent Championship performances suggests this might end up being the case. Time will tell.
Permalink | Comments (3)
Reblog (0) | |
If you learn the hotspots where bass seek optimum habitat in which to deposit their eggs, you’ll catch more bass than the average angler.
Back ends of creeks and coves are always good places to start and they are usually always good when situated along northern banks that receive plenty of sun.
If your favorite lake has lily pads, remember that they are not just great bass cover but they commonly spawn on the roots of the pads.
Shallow flats and points that grow thick with aquatic vegetation can be good if there are open areas that bass can use for nesting sites.
Look for pea-gravel bottoms usually found in creek arms and coves on the lower or deeper ends of reservoirs. Bass love to spawn in these areas.
Spring rains often flood shoreline bushes that were high and dry during the winter drawdown. The firm bottom and protective cover attract spawning bass.
Stacey King is a Member of the Bass Pro Shops® National Fishing Team
Presentation is a key element in fishing a cold front because of the way fish respond to the weather change. They tend to move close to cover and stay there, which means that their strike zone is much smaller than normal. You have to adapt to that change and concentrate on presentation to be effective.
You also may have to develop a "presentation pattern" to enjoy a full day of success. Keep track of where cold front fish are hitting your baits – on the deeper side of a flooded brushpile, for example – and concentrate on making casts to those kinds of spots.
You'll stop wasting time and start catching fish more often.
Also remember that simplicity is a key to consistent fishing success.
Keep things as simple as possible by sticking to the things you do best.
Kevin VanDam is a Member of the Bass Pro Shops® National Fishing Team
Spoons are sometimes overlooked as walleye baits, although they can be very effective – especially when fish are using weedbeds in water 10 feet deep or shallower.
When fishing areas like this for walleyes, try casting a spoon and fishing it as if you were after a bass. Vary your retrieve, pausing often to let the spoon flutter down like a wounded baitfish.
Many anglers use a snap or snap-swivel to attach spoons to their line, which assures that the lure will move through the water with maximum action.
Experiment with lure size and retrieve until you start catching fish. Then concentrate on consistency to "spoon feed" more walleyes on your next trip.
Gary Parsons is a Member of the Bass Pro Shops® National Team
For more tips, log onto basspro.com and click on News & Tips
Reblog (0) | |
We've all heard about how we should be more cautious concerning the frequency with which we hold bass using the "lip grip" due to torquing the jaw when handling and taking photos, especially with larger fish. I've spent much time trying to track down specific studies in the literature that actually confirm or refute the claims we read, but have pretty much come up empty. A lot of stuff we do while handling fish, we tend to think is the right or best way of doing so, but often studies don't support such claims. Hard to tell where or how these things get their beginnings, but needless to say, they get repeated ad infinitum in articles and forums year after year. Regardless, the following is the best article I've found on the subject that is rooted in solid scientific basis. It is by Justin Grubich, a fish physiology and biomechanics major who has studied the feeding mechanics and jaw pressures of a variety of fish...the same person responsible for that slow motion smallmouth feeding video from yesterday. Not stating right or wrong, as this piece is likely salt water biased, and as we all know, not all fish are created equal. Just makes for one of the better (educated) reads on the subject.
Why lifting fish by their lower jaw can significantly reduce post-release survival
Originally published in Salt Water Sportsman (Article>Gear-and-Techniques>Lip-Gripping-May-Harm-Fish)
March 1, 2004
By Justin Grubich, Ph.DWe've all done it: the classic trophy pose. You know, the one where you lift the fish by its lower jaw, either by placing your thumb in its mouth or with one of those popular lip-gripping devices. Before attending graduate school, I held many of my own catches in this manner. However, subsequent research into fish physiology and biomechanics - in which I earned my degree - has shown me that lifting fish by their lower jaw can cause severe and potentially life-threatening injuries. That's why I no longer do it.
It's understandable why lip-gripping is so universally accepted. For one thing, it's a convenient way of immobilizing the fish during the hook-removal process, plus it keeps slime and scales off your clothes and boat. Furthermore, the practice is perpetuated by the fishing media - lip-gripping appears everywhere, in magazines, newspapers, books and on TV.
To find out just how prevalent the technique is, I conducted an informal survey of recent fishing magazines (August to October 2003). I categorized the handling methods depicted in the photos as either "hoisting" (lifting the fish by its lower jaw or the corner of its gill plate) or "cradling" (supporting the fish with two hands in a roughly horizontal plane). In this simple survey, salt water anglers hoisted their catch by the lower jaw roughly 40 percent of the time. Some species, such as red drum, snook, tarpon, striped bass and seatrout, were jaw-hoisted more often, probably because the lack of sharp teeth on their lower jaw makes them easier to handle in this fashion. For comparison, salt water anglers fall somewhere between trout fly fishermen, who cradled nearly 100 percent of their fish in the photos I observed, and fresh water bass anglers, who appear to always hoist their fish by the lower jaw.
Handling techniques may seem a small issue until you consider all the physiological and anatomical stress experienced by the fish during the fighting and landing process. Muscle exhaustion, lactic acid buildup and hook punctures all reduce a fish's chances of post-release survival, so it's important to limit any additional forms of stress or injury. And one simple way to do this is to refrain from lifting them by their lower jaw.
Jaws of Life
The jaws of fish perform multiple functions during feeding. They are used to capture, manipulate, dispatch and, in some species, locate prey. For example, a red drum's jaw can detect the movements of buried prey through pressure-sensing extensions of the lateral line found in pits along the lower jaw bones and gill plates.
Although the mechanics of feeding appear to be as simple as the opening and closing of the mouth, the underlying sequence of muscle contractions and bone movements is actually very complex. Many of the fish we pursue, including striped bass, tarpon and snook, capture prey by generating a powerful suction that pulls the prey into the mouth. Suction feeding is accomplished by a dynamic sequence of head and jaw movements that creates a pulse of water that flows into the mouth and out the gills. First, the lower jaw rapidly opens. Next, the head begins to lift, the upper jaw protrudes, and the floor of the mouth depresses. Finally, when the jaws are open to their fullest extent, the cheeks rapidly expand and the gill plates flare to the sides. This expansive phase of the strike generally takes less than 0.03 seconds - faster than can be perceived by the human eye. After expansion, the strike concludes with the jaws quickly clamping shut, trapping or grasping the prey and preventing its escape. Fish will also often repeatedly bite and manipulate large or awkwardly shaped prey items in their jaws prior to swallowing.
The lower jaw plays a critical role in feeding mechanics in that its downward motion controls protrusion or extension of the upper jaw through ligaments. Jaw protrusion aides in prey capture by first shortening the distance to the prey and then creating a rounded oral tube for sucking it into the mouth. In most game fishes, the lower jaw rotates approximately 30 to 40 degrees during feeding. This rotation occurs at a pair of saddle joints at the bottom of each cheek. These joints are the only places where the lower jaw is attached to the rest of the fish's skull.
Mechanically speaking, the lower jaw mechanism emulates what engineers call a third-class lever system. Third-class levers are very common in the limbs and jaws of most animals. For example, your biceps, elbow joint and forearm form a third-class lever. This type of lever is good at transforming muscle force into speed at the jaw tip, but is not necessarily strong. The farther away weight is placed on the jaw from the center of rotation, the weaker the bite and the less able the jaw is to resist damaging forces. The length of a fish's lower jaw is directly proportional to the speed at which it is able to open and close its mouth and is inversely related to the strength of its bite. For example, species with relatively long lower jaws, such as snook and tarpon, have fast jaw movements but generally weak biting ability.
Too Much Weight
Regardless of the species, when you grab a fish by its lower jaw and lift it, you're placing nearly all of its body weight on that crucial lower jaw joint. In red drum, for example, the weight of the opening and closing jaw muscles and lower jaw bones make up less than two percent of the fish's total body weight.
Keep in mind also that the fish's jaw muscles, bones and joints have developed in the relatively weightless underwater environment, where they never experience such heavy loads. As fish get larger, jaw stability and strength do not increase proportionally, so bigger fish have relatively weaker jaws than smaller fish of the same species. Therefore, lifting big fish by the lower jaw can be even more harmful, because their jaw muscles are less able to resist the stretching forces of their heavier body weight.
Hyper-extension of the jaw can also damage the jaw's closing muscles, located in the cheeks. For example, if you tuck your elbow against your body when lifting a fish, stretching forces caused by the fish's body weight can tear the muscle fibers and tendons attached to the lower jaw bone and cause dislocation of the saddle joints. These kinds of injuries will prevent the fish from being able to quickly close its jaws during future feeding, which may allow its prey to escape.
The use of "lip grippers" and weighing devices, which do not necessarily hyper-extend the jaw, can still dislocate this critical joint in bigger fish and can potentially tear the jaw-opening muscles of the throat that attach to the inside of the lower jaw tip. Injury to these muscles and attachment sites will reduce the fish's ability to generate suction for feeding. Lip-gripping devices should be used primarily to control the fish's head so that you can place your other hand underneath the body to cradle it. Bottom line: only hold the fish vertically when measuring its weight is absolutely necessary.
Internal Damage
Hoisting a fish that you intend to release may not only injure its jaws and limit its ability to feed, it may also damage its internal organs. Remember, fish are designed to function in a buoyant environment, without the gravitational forces we experience on land. When you hold a really large fish vertically, the weight of its internal organs can stretch or tear the mesenteries that hold them in place, causing the internal organs to slump toward the tail. Such internal damage could have adverse effects on the fish's digestive functions.
If you are serious about ensuring the survival of a released fish, the best thing you can do is never remove it from the water. But what if you want to take a picture of the fish or need to bring it onboard to remove the hook? Fortunately, there are ways to handle a fish that will not cause as much harm as holding it by the lower jaw - and make for a better photo, as well!
Let's face it: holding a fish by its lower jaw doesn't really present it in the best light. After all, fish generally don't swim in a vertical position, so it's somewhat unnatural to see them held that way. The next time you pose with a fish, try cradling it in your arms, with one hand supporting its body. I think you'll be more pleased with the resulting photo, and you can also take comfort in the fact that you are giving the fish a better chance of survival.
Florida native and avid angler Justin Grubich received his Ph.D. in fish physiology and biomechanics from Florida State University in 2001. He would to thank Jason Schratwieser and Ron Taylor of the Florida Fish & Wildlife Commission for their help with this article.
Reblog (0) | |
This video should get you a bit fired up - a big smallmouth sucking in a baitfish in slow motion. And there is an ulterior motive to this. Consider it the lead-in to the next post to come.
Reblog (0) | |
Ancient Fishing Wisdom - I
Permalink | Comments (0)
Reblog (0) | |