Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Variation in Saugers
Matthew M. White
Science has gotten to the point where we can now better understand all kinds of things about individuals or animals based upon an examination of their genetic makeup. Fish are no different. For example, we have pieces posted to this site about the genetic mixing of northern and Florida strain largemouth bass down in Florida, as well as the unique lineages of walleye in America. This new study took a look to see if sauger, a close relative of the walleye, also displayed this unique and broken family grouping.
Using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence variation, the researchers evaluated genetic population structure in saugers. Turns out, saugers aren't walleye when it comes to their family tree.
-
Saugers display little genetic structure, and there is no apparent geographic pattern to the distribution of haplotypes.
-
Most haplotypes differ by one or a few bases (all haplotypes are <1% sequence divergent).
-
The observed distribution of sauger control region haplotypes is consistent with the hypothesis of a single Mississippian refuge and range expansion since the late Pleistocene.
-
Since saugers are known to be great travelers when it comes to spawning movements, they could have rapidly colonized much of the northern parts of their current distribution after the retreat of the Wisconsinan glaciers about 12,000 years ago.
-
Patterns of genetic variation suggested that Great Lakes walleye populations were probably colonized from three refugia: Atlantic, Mississippian, and Missourian). Additional, highly divergent walleye populations have been identified from unglaciated parts of the species’ native range, including the Ohio River, the Cumberland River, and the Mobile River basin. The apparent absence of phylogeographic structure in saugers is quite different from the structure observed in walleyes.
The practical application: Since it doesn't appear that sauger have unique and localized (specialized) populations, biologists can be a bit more liberal with their stocking policies, and not run the risk of diluting or polluting the natural gene pool of local populations.